PR checklist
- The contribution type is explicit.
- The file or folder is in the correct path.
- The matching template or required structure was followed.
- The content is repo-native and not copied from upstream material.
- Citations or source notes are present where needed.
- The contribution links back into the lab so it is discoverable.
- Status and maintenance expectations are clear.
Reviewer rubric
Placement
- Is this the right contribution type?
- Is it in the correct lane or contributor path?
Completeness
- Are the required files or sections present?
- Does the artifact explain what it is for?
Source boundary
- Is external influence cited without slipping into copy-paste?
- Are imported
references/materials kept separate from contributor output?
Integration
- Does the contribution connect to the rest of the repo through links?
- Is the change easy for the next contributor to understand and extend?
Quality
- Is the writing clear and durable?
- If code exists, is the structure clean and scoped to the example?